Ujasusi Blog

Ujasusi Blog

UK to UN: Samia's Own Commission Cannot Investigate Samia

Evarist Chahali's avatar
Evarist Chahali
Mar 05, 2026
∙ Paid
President Samia Suluhu Hassan, together with Chief Secretary Ambassador Dr. Moses Kusiluka and Justice Mohamed Chande Othman, Chair of the Independent Commission of Inquiry into the violence during and after the 29 October 2025 General Election, pose for a group photo with commission members at State House, Chamwino, on 20 November 2025 [Photo: MAELEZO]

Tanzania’s post-election violence is now a formal matter before the UN Human Rights Council, with the United Kingdom citing evidence of extra-judicial killings and concealment of bodies following October 2025 elections. Tanzania’s government has rejected these allegations as selective and politically motivated, countering that October 29 events constituted organised terrorism — not state-sponsored atrocities.

Table of Contents

  1. What Did the UK Say at the UN Human Rights Council Session 61?

  2. Does the UK Statement Invalidate the Othman Commission?

  3. How Did Tanzania Respond at the UNHRC?

  4. What Is the Status of the Othman Commission of Inquiry?

  5. Why Does This Matter Strategically? An Intelligence Assessment

  6. Key Actors: Quick Reference

  7. What Happens Next?

  8. Strategic Outlook

What Did the UK Say at the UN Human Rights Council Session 61?

At the UNHRC 61 Item 2 General Debate, UK Human Rights Ambassador Eleanor Sanders delivered a targeted statement on Tanzania, describing the post-election period as marked by “shocking violence,” including evidence of extra-judicial killings and the deliberate concealment of dead bodies.

Sanders called for an independent, transparent, and inclusive investigation to ensure:

  • Accountability for alleged state-sanctioned violence

  • Protection of fundamental freedoms enshrined in Tanzania’s constitution

  • The constitutional rights of all Tanzanian citizens, regardless of political affiliation

The UK statement was not an isolated intervention. It was delivered alongside statements from Belgium, Switzerland, Sweden, Ireland, Norway, the European Union, and civil society actors Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International — constituting a coordinated multilateral pressure campaign at the Council’s most scrutinised session of 2026.

Does the UK Statement Invalidate the Othman Commission?

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2026 Evarist Chahali · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture