📉 Tanzania’s Anti-Regime Protests: Analysing Declining Street Mobilisation and Alternative Resistance Pathways (2025-2026)

Ujasusi Blog’s East Africa Monitoring Team | 03 Dec 2026 | 0215 GMT

---

In Brief

Anti-Samia Suluhu Hassan street protests in Tanzania experienced severe declining turnout following the October 29 massacre, with subsequent mobilisation attempts on December 9 and 25, 2025, and January 1, 2026 producing minimal participation. This decline stemmed from systematic state repression killing 5,000-10,000 civilians over three days, strategic deplatforming of key mobiliser Mange Kimambi, infiltration by Tanzania Intelligence and Security Service (TISS), organisational fragmentation, and tactical missteps. However, resistance efforts continue through alternative strategies including social boycotts and civil disobedience campaigns.

---

Table of Contents

1. What Factors Drove the Decline in Street Protest Participation After October 29?

   • State Violence as Deterrent: The October 29 Massacre

   • Strategic Deplatforming: The Mange Kimambi Case Study

   • Infiltration and Intelligence Operations

   • The “Habil and Kabil” Deception Operation

   • Strategic Timing Failures

   • Organisational Fragmentation and Leadership Competition

2. How Do Tanzania’s Protests Compare to Successful Resistance Movements?

   • Table 1: Comparative Analysis of Resistance Movement Characteristics

   • Table 2: Comparison of Habil and Kabil vs. Mange Kimambi

3. What Alternative Resistance Strategies Could Be Effective Against the Samia Regime?

   • Strategy 1: Social and Economic Boycott (The Zanzibar Model)

   • Strategy 2: Nonviolent Non-Cooperation (The Otpor Model)

   • Strategy 3: Economic Pressure Through Strategic Strikes

   • Strategy 4: International Pressure Amplification

   • Strategy 5: Alternative Institution Building

4. What Strategic Principles Should Guide Future Resistance Efforts?

5. Why Did December 9, 2025 Protests Produce Limited Turnout?

   • Table 3: December 9 Suppression vs. Mobilisation Assessment

6. What Lessons Emerge from the Habil and Kabil Deception?

   • Intelligence Assessment Summary

   • Comparative Tradecraft Examples

   • Operational Security Lessons

7. Medium-Term Outlook: Will Future Protests Succeed?

   • Table 4: Future Protest Viability Assessment

8. Conclusion: Strategic Adaptation, Not Abandonment

🔍 What Factors Drove the Decline in Street Protest Participation After October 29?

The dramatic reduction in street protest turnout following Tanzania’s historic October 29, 2025 demonstrations illustrates how authoritarian regimes systematically suppress civil resistance through coordinated repression, technological control, and psychological warfare. Understanding these factors is essential for developing adaptive resistance strategies.

1. State Violence as Deterrent: The October 29 Massacre

The October 29 protests marked what The Economist termed “terror on an unprecedented scale” for Tanzania, with security forces deploying live ammunition against unarmed civilians across Dar es Salaam, Arusha, and Mwanza. This violence fundamentally altered the risk-benefit calculation for potential protesters.

Documented casualties:

• ICC submissions document 5,000-10,000 people killed over three days following election protests

• Intelwatch alleges security forces used live ammunition rather than standard crowd control

• Evidence of targeted executions including sniper attacks from significant distances

• UN Human Rights Office confirmed hundreds killed with thousands likely unaccounted for

• At least 240 people charged with treason in connection with protests

• Over 2,000 detained according to multiple sources

Evidence of systematic violence:

• CNN investigations documented satellite imagery showing mass burial sites north of Dar es Salaam

• Video footage showed police shooting civilians who posed no immediate threat

• Security forces transported bodies to undisclosed locations, preventing families from claiming remains

• One morgue alone reportedly containing 800 bodies

• Medical professionals threatened with death if releasing casualty figures

• Army Chief Jacob Mkunda publicly labelled protesters “criminals”

Psychological impact: Unlike October 29 when many Gen-Z protesters were unaware of the regime’s capacity for brutality, subsequent potential demonstrators possessed full knowledge of the lethal consequences. This information asymmetry created what resistance scholars term “demonstration effect trauma”—where visible consequences of participation become so severe that rational actors prioritise survival over collective action.

2. Strategic Deplatforming: The Mange Kimambi Case Study

Mange Kimambi, known as “Dada wa Taifa” (Sister of the Nation), served as the primary mobiliser for October 29 protests, spending approximately three months encouraging youth participation through her Instagram platform with nearly three million followers. Her deplatforming by Meta on December 3, 2025 exemplifies authoritarian digital suppression strategies.

Timeline of suppression:

• Pre-October 29: Kimambi spent three months mobilising via Instagram, setting protest date and encouraging peaceful participation

• November-December: Shared graphic documentation of casualties, posting evidence of state violence

• December 3, 2025: Meta permanently disabled her Instagram accounts (@mangekimambi80 and @wananchiforum) citing “recidivism policy” violations

• Simultaneous action: Fellow activist Maria Sarungi-Tsehai’s account geo-restricted in Tanzania following legal order

Impact on mobilisation capacity:

• Loss of nearly 3 million combined followers across platforms

• Elimination of primary coordination channel for Gen-Z protesters

• Disruption of real-time documentation of human rights abuses

• Reduced ability to counter regime propaganda

Government response: Attorney General Hamza Johari publicly demanded Kimambi’s arrest and extradition from the United States, stating: “It is not acceptable for someone, a lady, to just be sitting outside the United Republic of Tanzania like that, and telling people to do this [protest], and they actually go and do it.”

3. Infiltration and Intelligence Operations

TISS collaboration with CCM’s Youth Wing (UVCCM) deployed sophisticated counter-mobilisation strategies:

Documented infiltration tactics:

• Penetration of Gen-Z “virtual meetings” on TikTok and other platforms

• Monitoring of opposition coordination channels

• Deployment of informants within activist networks

• Real-time intelligence gathering on protest planning

Counterintelligence implications: The leaderless structure of post-October protests, whilst theoretically offering resilience, created vulnerability to infiltration. Without centralised security protocols or vetting mechanisms, TISS operatives could easily join planning sessions, gather intelligence on participant identities, and disrupt coordination.

4. The “Habil and Kabil” Phenomenon

A suspicious character using the moniker “Habil and Kabil” engaged in what appears to be a sophisticated psychological operation ahead of December 9 protests.

---

ALSO READ

The "Habil and Kabil" Phenomenon: Intelligence Assessment of Tanzania's Mysterious December 9 Protest Mobiliser

---

Promised deliverables (unfulfilled):

• Claimed extraordinary hacking capabilities

• Assured UN protection for December 9 protesters

• Made multiple guarantees regarding international intervention

• Built credibility through technical demonstrations

• Promised technology to obtain biometric data by looking at people

Actual impact:

• Thousands of would-be protesters remained home expecting promised protection

• Undermined trust in future mobilisation efforts

• Created disillusionment with resistance leadership

• Potential PSYOP to fracture activist community

Intelligence assessment: The sophistication of this operation, combined with its timing and impact, suggests potential state involvement. Classic counterintelligence doctrine involves inflating expectations then failing to deliver, thereby discrediting leadership and creating activist fatigue.

Per Ujasusi Blog’s assessment: 70-80% probability of TISS psychological operation.

5. Strategic Timing Failures

Organisers scheduled three consecutive protests on public holidays—December 9 (Independence Day), December 25 (Christmas), and January 1 (New Year’s Day)—a tactical error with multiple negative consequences.

Why public holidays undermined mobilisation:

• Reduced urban population density as residents travelled to rural areas

• Families prioritised holiday observances over protest participation

• Easier for regime to frame protests as disrespectful to national celebrations

• Simplified security forces’ lockdown operations with fewer legitimate civilians on streets

• Workers unable to use “general strike” tactics when businesses already closed

Alternative approach: Historical successful movements like Serbia’s Otpor and the US Civil Rights Movement strategically chose working days to maximise disruption to economic activity and demonstrate widespread participation across society.

---

ALSO READ

Tanzania December 9 Protests: Sporadic Demonstrations Despite 116 Arrests and Military Deployment

---

6. Organisational Fragmentation and Leadership Competition

The Tanzanian activist sphere suffered from endemic disunity, described as “they are all chasing same thief but each wants to be the first to apprehend the thief and they end up chasing each other.”

Manifestations of fragmentation:

• Multiple competing voices claiming leadership after Kimambi’s deplatforming

• Lack of coordinated strategy or unified messaging

• Personal ambitions overriding collective objectives

• Failure to establish transparent decision-making structures

• Absence of shared tactical analysis or lessons-learned processes

Historical parallel: Tanzania’s opposition parties have long exhibited similar disunity. This activist fragmentation mirrors broader political opposition weaknesses that have enabled CCM’s six-decade dominance.

📊 How Do Tanzania’s Protests Compare to Successful Resistance Movements?

---