Intelligence Insight | 9/11 Commemoration Amid Charlie Kirk Assassination: Is U.S. on Path to Civil War?
UJasusi Blog’s U.S. Monitoring Desk | 12 September 2025 | 0130 BST
🔓FREE ACCESS
🔍 Executive Summary
The assassination of conservative political influencer Charlie Kirk on the eve of the September 11 commemorations has triggered a dangerous fusion of political martyrdom, national trauma, and escalating extremist rhetoric. With the American right already likening the killing to an act of terrorism and calling for retaliation, the country now faces a crucial inflexion point. This intelligence insight examines whether the United States is on the brink of self-destruction — not through external attack, but by internal political implosion.
🕯️ 9/11 + Assassination: A Toxic Convergence
On September 10, 2025, conservative activist and Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk was assassinated during a live event at Utah Valley University. The attack came just hours before Americans gathered to mark the 24th anniversary of the September 11 attacks, a day deeply woven into national identity.
Almost immediately, far-right political figures declared the shooting an act of domestic terrorism. Some, like Steve Bannon, even called for a retaliatory war, framing the killing as an attack by ideological enemies.
🔥 Conservative War Cries: From Grief to Vengeance
Within hours of the assassination, rhetoric on conservative platforms escalated:
Steve Bannon declared the event a "declaration of war".
Tucker Carlson warned that "the left will keep killing until they are stopped".
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene accused the Biden administration of inciting terrorism.
Donald Trump called on the country to prepare for “war within”.
These responses, drenched in the emotive symbolism of 9/11, are being strategically weaponised to galvanise conservative bases and legitimise escalatory responses.
⚠️ Key Risk Vectors
🧨 1. Weaponisation of 9/11 Memory
The framing of Kirk’s assassination through the lens of 9/11 is legitimising calls for violence.
📢 2. Rhetorical Escalation from Conservative Influencers
The use of “terrorism,” “civil war,” and “enemy within” is fuelling lone-wolf mobilisation.
🏛️ 3. Institutional Fragility
Law enforcement agencies are facing intense scrutiny amid fears of political bias. Investigations are already being criticised as politicised.
🌐 4. Information Warfare
Russian-linked influence networks have begun amplifying conspiracy theories, using Kirk’s death to deepen internal U.S. polarisation.
🧠 Historical Echoes
📉 Risk Assessment: Is the U.S. Self-Destructing?
⏳ Outlook
⏱️ Short-Term (0–12 months)
Increased political street violence
Reactionary legislation introduced in GOP-controlled states
Conspiracist rhetoric mainstreamed
📆 Medium-Term (1–3 years)
Federal surveillance and censorship lawsuits
Polarised midterm and 2026 presidential campaigns
Fragmentation of national political consensus
🧭 Long-Term (3–5+ years)
Sustained ideological cold civil war
Normalisation of political assassinations
Decline in U.S. international prestige
🧩 Final Assessment
The United States is not in terminal collapse — yet. But the convergence of Charlie Kirk’s politically charged assassination and the symbolism of 9/11 creates a moment of maximal volatility. The trajectory toward self-destruction is not inevitable, but highly plausible if corrective steps are not urgently taken.
The greatest risk lies in the normalisation of retribution, the suspension of facts, and the abandonment of democratic guardrails. This moment must be met with restraint, not revenge — or the U.S. may plunge into a slow-burning civil conflict with no return.
SUPPORT UJASUSI BLOG
Please consider becoming a paid subscriber.
You can also donate.